Legal Opinion

Schalliol v. Fare

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-224, CIV.A. 01-5671PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATZ, Senior District Judge.

Now before the court are two motions by the United States for the determination of the choice of law. Each motion pertains to one of the above-captioned lawsuits, both of which arise from a fatal plane crash. 1 In both suits, the United States is a defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et al. (FTCA), for the alleged negligence of its air traffic controllers and its allegedly negligent publication of materials listing an approach to an airplane runway that was, in fact, not in service. Upon consideration of the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liranzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. C.D.A. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API