Legal Opinion

GILMORE BY GILMORE v. Dondero

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1990No. 3333PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The central issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in reducing the amount of counsel fees payable out of the proceeds of a compromise of a minor’s claim from the one-third fee agreed to between counsel and the minor’s parents to a one-quarter fee. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.

On May 20, 1988, Shani Gilmore, then 9 years old, was injured when she was struck by a car operated by Victoria Dondero. Ms. Dondero was insured by Aetna Casualty and Surety Insurance Company for $100,000 liability coverage. Sheila and Marvin Gilmore, Shani’s parents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. LaRocca EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Thompson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Estate of WanamakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Ryan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Wilson v. Bensalem Township School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sutch, R. v. Roxborough MemorialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Nice v. Centennial Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Taylor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Carlino E. Brandywine, L.P. v. Brandywine Vill. Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API