Webco Lumber, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge
Once again, we must determine whether the estimates in a government timber-cutting contract of the amounts of recoverable timber constituted a warranty, for the breach of which the contractor may recover where the timber actually removed was substantially less than the estimated amount. The plaintiff seeks damages apparently reflecting the difference between the value of the estimated timber and the timber it removed. The defendant has moved for summary judgment. We hold that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. We therefore grant the motion and dismiss the petition.
I
A. In 1976, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Timber Investors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Russell & Pugh Lumber Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- McGrew Bros. SawmillUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
3Cited by26 opinions
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Roseburg Lumber Company v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Stuyvesant Dredging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.