Legal Opinion

Hall v. Northern & Southern Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon petition for rehearing in this case the following opinion was rendered:

Whitfield, J.

—Ina petition for rehearing it is suggested that the demurrer to the declaration does not state as substantial matters of law the particular grounds on which the court found the declaration to be defective.

If a declaration fails to allege substantive facts that are essential to a right of action the trial court or the appellate court may take notice of such fatal defect and m,ake a proper disposition of the cause. See Eddins v. Tweddle, 35 Fla. 107, 17 South. Rep. 66; Florida Cent. & P. R. Co. v. Ashmore,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. AshmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Kittel v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  3. Eddins v. TweddleSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. HilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Dekle v. CalhounSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Sylvester v. LichtensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District Grand Lodge No. 27 of the Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  5. The Mortimer Company v. FridsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API