Legal Opinion

The Mortimer Company v. Fridstein

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 1, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

-In this case the Court below sustained a demurrer to a common law declaration seeking recovery of certain moneys which are alleged to have been paid to defendant as earnest money under a contract for the purchase and sale of real estate.

Judgment on the demurrer was entered in favor of defendant as to the two special counts of the declaration which are to be considered on this writ of error.

While the demurrer which was sustained does not comply’with Section 2641, Rev. Gen. Stats., 4307 C.G.L., in that it does not specifically set out the substantial matters of law intended to be argued- under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Heathcote v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Vance v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Kittel v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Sylvester v. LichtensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Gulf Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Bardwell, Et Ux. v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Fontainebleau Hotel v. WaltersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API