Legal Opinion

Dekle v. Calhoun

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This case was decided by the court En Banc. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the corirt.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

The declaration filed by J. M, Calhoun against M. L. Dekle alleges in substance that a tenant of the' plaintiff was indebted to him for rent and other claims for which the plaintiff had a statutory lien superior to all others upon certain cotton produced by the tenant on plaintiff’s land; that the defendant took possession of the property and converted the same to his own use and benefit, thereby depriving plaintiff of his statutory lien for which damages were claimed. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and on writ of error it is urged that the declaration does not state a cause of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. HilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Merchants & Planters Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Folmar & Sons v. Copeland & BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Hall v. Northern & Southern Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  3. United States v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Bel-Bel International Corp. v. Community Bank of HomesteadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Alford v. Barnett National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API