Legal Opinion
PENA-MEJIA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2019No. 3952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 546
(BIA 2019) Interim Decision #3952 Matter of Lourdes Suyapa PENA-MEJIA, Respondent Decided May 22, 2019 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Neither rescission of an in absentia order of removal nor termination of the proceedings is required where an alien did not appear at a scheduled hearing after being served with a notice to appear that did not specify the time and place of the initial removal hearing, so long as a subsequent notice of hearing specifying that information was properly sent to the alien. Pereira…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Serah Karingithi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Gomez-Palacios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- BERMUDEZ-COTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Leonel Hernandez-Perez v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Samuel Dacostagomez-Aguilar v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- LAPARRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Varinder Singh v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- MIRANDA-CORDIEROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- R-T-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.