Legal Opinion
Leonel Hernandez-Perez v. Matthew Whitaker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2018No. 18-3137PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.
*309 Leonel Hernandez-Perez originally applied for cancellation of removal based on hardship that his removal would cause his U.S. citizen daughter, L. After that application was denied, he filed a motion to reopen removal proceedings based on hardship to his other U.S. citizen child, a boy named A.W. The BIA denied the motion to reopen for two reasons: (1) Hernandez-Perez had not established that the new evidence was previously unavailable, and (2) even if the evidence was considered, it did not establish prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. Because…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Serah Karingithi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Mario Ortiz-Santiago v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Darvin Daniel Perez-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Banegas Gomez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.