Legal Opinion
MIRANDA-CORDIERO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2019No. 3953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 551
(BIA 2019) Interim Decision #3953 Matter of Renata MIRANDA-CORDIERO, Respondent Decided May 22, 2019 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Pursuant to section 240(b)(5)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(B) (2012), neither rescission of an in absentia order of removal nor termination of the proceedings is required where an alien who was served with a notice to appear that did not specify the time and place of the initial removal hearing failed to provide an address where a notice of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- BERMUDEZ-COTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Roberto Mauricio-Benitez v. Jefferson Sessions, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- G-Y-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LAPARRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Rodriguez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Oscar Canales-Berrios v. William Barr, U. S. AttyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020