Legal Opinion
Cleary v. United States Lines Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 15, 1967No. 64 AD 828PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COOPER, District Judge.
Libellant longshoreman brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him on October 7, 1968, resulting from the alleged unseaworthiness and negligence of the S.S. Pioneer Myth.
*602Respondent United States Lines Company, Inc. (hereinafter U.S. Lines), the owner and operator of the vessel on the day in question, has impleaded stevedore T. Hogan & Sons, Inc. (hereinafter Hogan), libellant’s employer, seeking full indemnity by way of claim over.
By agreement of the parties at trial, proof as to damages was not presented; it was held in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Mascuilli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carmelo Candiano v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. John W. McGrath Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cleary v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Tarabocchia v. Zim Israel Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Daniel Cleary, Libellant (Plaintiff) v. United States Lines Company, Respondent-Petitioner-Appellant (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant) v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellant (Third-Party Defendant-Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Robertson v. Sanyo MaruDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969