Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping Authority
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
The libellant has moved for a rehearing upon our ruling that he did not elect to sue “in rem” until after we had suggested it to him at the end of our opinion. We have granted a rehearing on that issue, and, as will appear below, we think that there was enough evidence to support an “election.” Moreover, sinee the merits of the claim of a lien against the ship had not been at issue on the appeal, we have felt obliged to allow briefs to be filed on that issue also, and therefore the appeal comes before us in these two aspects. First, we will say why we think that the suit…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kathleen Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.