Legal Opinion
Daniel Cleary, Libellant (Plaintiff) v. United States Lines Company, Respondent-Petitioner-Appellant (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant) v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellant (Third-Party Defendant-Appellant)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 2, 1969No. 33126Published
1Opinion of the Court
411 F.2d 1009
Daniel CLEARY, Libellant (Plaintiff) Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Respondent-Petitioner-Appellant
(Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant), v. T. HOGAN
& SONS, INC., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellant (Third-Party
Defendant-Appellant).
No. 554, Docket 33126.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 25, 1969.
Decided June 2, 1969.
Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, and Craig D. Walley, New York City, on the brief), for United States Lines Co.
Frank A. Fritz, New York City (Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz and Craig D.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carmelo Candiano v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. John W. McGrath Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Mamiye Bros. v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Cleary v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Radovich v. Cunard Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Esso Standard Oil v. Gasbras SulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.