Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hendrickson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 1927No. 15847PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
In this appeal the parties appear as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff, on January 24, 1924, filed its petition for the recovery of certain alleged illegal and void tases assessed and levied against its property in Latimer county for the fiscal year of 1923, which it paid under protest to the defendant as county treasurer of said county. The petition contained six causes of action.
On February 2, 1924, defendant filed a motion to require plaintiff to mate the second and fourth causes of action more definite and certain, and that plaintiff attach a copy of its protest under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Presbyterian Hospital, Inc. v. Board of Tax-Roll CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Antrim Lumber Co. v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Grubb v. Smiley, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.