Legal Opinion

D.D.A. v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2009No. 20071015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION *

On Certification from the Utah Court of Appeals.

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 This appeal requires us to determine whether the juvenile court erred by failing to grant Daniel Dean Austin ("Mr. Austin") an evidentiary hearing on his motion to determine his right to notice of and consent to the adoption of D.A., a minor child, under Utah Code section 78-80-4.14 (Supp.2007).1 Section 78-80-4.14 broadly addresses when consent to an adoption is necessary and specifically sets forth the requirements an unmarried biological father must satisfy before his consent to an adoption is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SommervilleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  2. J.P. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Jensen v. RuflinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. Tooele Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Tooele City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Hansen v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API