Jensen v. Ruflin

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

■¶ 1 Timothy Ruflin appeals the district court’s decision overruling his objection to a protective order entered against him. We agree with the district court that the protective order was not barred by either the doc-tripe of res judicata or the Cohabitant Abuse Act’s limitations on mutual protective orders. Further, we conclude that the court acted within its discretion when denying Ruffin’s request to continue the-hearing on his objection. Accordingly, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On October 21, 2015, Ruflin spotted his brother-in-law, Craig .Alan Jensen, and resolved to pick…