Legal Opinion

Frazer v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1893No. 915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

The defendants, from July 1, 1889, to March 6,1890, were engaged in conducting a livery stable business under the firm name of Miller & Son. The plaintiff worked for them during this time, and earned $490. At the latter date A. J. Miller sold out his interest in said business to his son Drew-Miller, who assumed the debts of *523the firm, and Frazer continued to work for the son from March 6 till August 31, 1890, and earned §352.

The son was treasurer and bookkeeper for the co-partnership during its existence, and made all payments of wages, and he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HunterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1806
  2. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Hughes & Co. v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Diettrich Bros., Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ellingsen v. Western Farmers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API