Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In Re Ritz)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO DENY DIS-CHARGEABILITY OF DEBT PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 523
[Adv. Docket No. 1]
JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
This adversary proceeding concerns an individual debtor who authorized transfers of funds out of one corporation into the accounts of several other companies — all of which he controlled. As a result of these transfers, the one corporation was drained of all of its cash and, therefore, could not pay its creditors. One of these creditors has filed suit against the debtor, alleging that: (a) because of the debtor’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In re Ritz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Hulsing Hotels Tennessee, Inc. v. Steffner (In re Steffner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Murphy v. Felice (In re Felice)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.