Legal Opinion
Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 17, 2011No. 20-02054PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE: HUNTINGTON’S JULY 13, 2011 MOTION — AMENDMENT TO APRIL 28, 2009 PRETRIAL ORDER-CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
JEFFREY R. HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Huntington National Bank (“Huntington”) has filed a motion to amend my 1 April 28, 2009 pretrial order. The requested amendment would eliminate the order’s designation of this adversary proceeding as a matter in which I can enter a final determination subject only to ordinary appellate review. Huntington contends that I lack the constitutional authority to enter what in this instance could be a multi-million dollar judgment against it…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Deitz v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Burtch v. Seaport Capital, LLC (In re Direct Response Media, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- Deitz v. Ford (In Re Deitz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Safety Harbor Resort and SpaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.