Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Robertson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1993No. 92-562PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Robert Zimmerman appeals from a judgment on directed verdict entered in favor of G.D. Robertson by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County. We affirm.

We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Is expert testimony required in a negligence action against a veterinarian?

2. Did the defendant’s testimony constitute sufficient evidence of deviations from the standard of care to enable the plaintiff to withstand a directed verdict?

3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in refusing to admit testimony regarding whether the defendant obtained the informed consent of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Scott v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carlson v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Workman v. McIntyre Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Newville v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. EhretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API