Legal Opinion

Murphy Homes, Inc. v. Muller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2007No. 05-237PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Patrick Aberle and Marilyn Muller, who are husband and wife (collectively “Aberle/Muller”), appeal a jury verdict in the District Court for the Fifth Judicial District, Jefferson County, awarding Murphy Homes, Inc. (Murphy Homes), damages, punitive damages, attorney’s fees and costs. The case involves a cost-plus contract wherein Murphy Homes agreed to do certain building and remodeling to Aberle/Muller’s residence. We affirm.

¶2 Aberle/Muller present eleven issues for review, however, their brief is broken down into six main issues or contentions (as Aberle/Muller refer to them) and more…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Brad v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DethmanMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Tarlton v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Mark Spotted Horse v. BNSF RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API