Legal Opinion
Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 26, 2001No. 97-1557 & 99-1511PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company (“WVIC” or “the company”) petitions for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) orders imposing conditions on its license to operate a hy-dropower project. In addition to charging WVIC an annual fee for “use” of submerged federal lands, the licensing order requires petitioner to implement a “wild rice enhancement plan.” FERC imposed the latter condition at the instance of inter-venors United States Forest Service and Department of the Interior (“the agencies”),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Angela Stroe and Marin Stroe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Earthlink, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.