Legal Opinion

Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation Administration

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 4, 2006No. 05-1383PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act- (“RFRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq., requires strict scrutiny of a federal agency’s approval of an airport layout plan incident to a determination of eligibility for federal funding if the plan, when implemented by a subdivision of a state, may burden religious exercise. Because O’Hare International Airport, by some measures “the busiest airport in the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. City of Dania Beach v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. City of Dania Beach v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API