Steelman-Duff, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.

*223GRABER, J.

This case involves interpretation of the attorney fees provision in ORS 279.067(4). The Court of Appeals held that, under ORS 279.067(4), J.C. Compton Contractor, Inc. (Compton), was not entitled to attorney fees in this action. Steel-man-Duff, Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation, 135 Or App 545, 549, 899 P2d 752 (1995). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

ORS 279.067 provides:

“(1) Any bidder adversely affected or any trade association of construction contractors acting on behalf of a member of the association to protect interests common to construction contractor members may…