Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
S&B 1 moves for reconsideration of our order of March 11, 1997, in which we denied its petition for attorney fees on appeal. We grant the motion to reconsider, withdraw our former order in part, and award S&B attorney fees of $32,508.75.
On December 4, 1996, we issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment in this case. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-Met, 145 Or App 12, 929 P2d 331 (1996), rev den 325 Or 80 (1997). We designated both Tri-Met and S&B as prevailing parties on the appeal and awarded them costs, payable by appellant Schlumberger. Under ORS 20.320 and our rules,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Samuels v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Steelman-Duff, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Marriage of HolmOregon Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
- MAN Aktiengesellschaft v. DaimlerChrysler AGCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.