State v. Clum

Defendant appeals his conviction for failure to report as a sex offender, ORS 181.599(lXd), 1 arguing that he had no duty to make an annual report as a sex offender because he moved to Oregon before the pertinent reporting statute, ORS 181.597(l)(aXC), 2 was enacted. We reverse.

The parties stipulated to the following facts. In 1986, 1988, and 1990, defendant was found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court in the State of Washington for committing offenses that would constitute sex offenses under Oregon law. In 1998, 2000, and 2001, defendant reported as a sex offender in Oregon.…