Legal Opinion
Washington Post v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 19, 2006No. Civil Action 06-1737 (RMU)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for A Preliminary Injunction
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, The Washington Post (the “Post”), seeks records concerning individuals who visited Vice President Richard Cheney and his senior staff at both the White House Complex and the Vice President’s residence from the United States Secret Service (“Secret Service”), a division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). The plaintiff claims that it is entitled to this information under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, et. seq.,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Daily Caller v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Sai v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.