Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
Plaintiff suffered personal injuries as a consequence of an automobile, which he was operating after dark, colliding with a concrete base on which was set a stanchion to support a traffic control signal or tower maintained by the defendant village at the intersection of two of its streets. His complaint against the village sets out two causes of action. The first is on the theory of nuisance in locating or maintaining the structure without adequate lighting to warn motorists of the existence or extent of what is claimed to be a dangerous obstruction in the public highway. The second is on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Koehler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Parsons v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Parsons v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Collett v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Parson v. Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Crow v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Kirk v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Tolliver v. City of NewarkOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Enstrom v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.