Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1954No. 7426PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Judge.

This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiffs claim to be the owners of Lots One and Two (1-2), East Half (Ey2) of Northwest Quarter (NW^.) and the Northeast Quarter (NE54) of Section Thirty-one (31), Township One Hundred Fifty-one (151), North, Range Ninety-four (94) West of the 5th P.M. The defendant, Amerada Petroleum Corporation, claims to hold an oil and gas lease on said premises. McKenzie County makes no appearance. The purpose of the lawsuit is to determine the validity of said oil and gas lease. The district court found for the defendant and plaintiffs appeal demanding…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hefner v. Northwestern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Buman v. SturnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Coulter v. RambergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Frandson v. CaseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brink v. CurlessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Corbett v. La BereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API