Legal Opinion

Waldeck v. Hedden

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1928No. Docket No. 6129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

This was an action for the specific performance of an agreement of exchange by which the defendant Fred F. Hedden agreed to exchange several pieces of property or equities in the city of Los Angeles together with $5,000 for plaintiff’s stock ranch and personal property thereon, in the county of Tulare. Two other actions growing out of the same transaction were commenced by defendants against plaintiffs on the same day and these were coincidently tried by the court upon the same evidence. One of these actions was an action by the Heddens against Waldeck for a rescission of the exchange…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Olson v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Davis v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ryan v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Early v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Gantner v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Janssen v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API