Commonwealth v. Joseph
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In these two appeals1 following appellant Dominick Joseph’s convictions for criminal solicitation to commit rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse and related offenses, we consider whether the trial court had the authority to impose a suspended sentence. We also address evi-dentiary issues related to the entrapment defense and Joseph’s additional claims of trial error. We vacate and remand for resentencing.
¶ 2 In the summer of 2001, the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office (AGO) set up an online sting operation aimed at apprehending people who seek to have sexual contact…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commonwealth v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. NolenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. DuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth v. WeiskergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SasseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Thompson, T. v. Thompson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Barcola v. Hourigan, Kluger & Quinn P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2006
- Com. v. Whitmire, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Whitmire, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.