Legal Opinion

Barcola v. Hourigan, Kluger & Quinn P.C.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided December 29, 2006No. nos. 02 CV 338, 03 CV 2329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, J,

Plaintiffs have instituted this legal malpractice action against their for*396mer counsel who unsuccessfully litigated a medical malpractice claim on their behalf and allege that counsel allowed the statute of limitations governing their related products liability claim to expire while counsel pursued the medical malpractice suit. Plaintiffs have served requests for admissions in this legal malpractice action seeking to have their former counsel admit the nature and extent of the male plaintiff’s injuries as well as the resulting economic and non-economic damages, based upon assertions…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Power Control Devices, Inc. v. LernerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  2. Euceda v. Green, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API