Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weiskerger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1989No. 54-56 E.D. Appeal Docket 1987PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSEN,* Justice.

The issues presented for our consideration by these cases involve the defense of entrapment in a criminal prosecution. Specifically, we are called upon to determine 1) whether our Crimes Code embodies an objective or a subjective standard to guide a factfinder in the application of that defense; and 2) whether “defendants who did not testify at trial and who failed to admit either their participation in the crimes charged or in any of the elements of the crimes charged were nonetheless entitled to a jury instruction on entrapment.” Brief for Appellant at 3.

Appellees, Elmer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. BuksaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. KratsasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. MarionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API