Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Stephenson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to review proceedings in justice’s court to enforce a lien for labor on saw-logs.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Thomas Reilly worked 148 days as a foreman in defendant’s lumber camp, at an agreed price of $60 a month. His work-consisted in cutting and banking saw-logs, and the last work performed was on the twenty-third of March, 1886.

On the twentieth of April, 1886, he filed a claim of lien upon between eight and nine hundred thousand- feet of pine saw-logs, upon which his labor had beetl performed, under Act No. 145 of the Public Laws of 1881. On the same day he made and filed with a justice of .the peace an affidavit in the form provided by that act, and the justice issued an attachment in the form…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winslow v. UrquhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Redington v. FryeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  4. Collins v. CowanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Doe v. MonsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Brown v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Pack, Woods & Co. v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hughes v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Plurede v. LevasseurSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API