Legal Opinion

Pack, Woods & Co. v. Simpson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to quash a writ of attachment in a log-lien suit. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are state'” in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The petition for mandamus in this cause states, substantially, that the relator is a corporation organized under the laws of this State, and that on August 22, 1887, James Whiting, through Trask & Smith, attorneys at law, sued out •of the circuit court for the county of Iosco a writ of attachment directed to the sheriff of said county, commanding him to take all the pine logs found in said county bearing the marks1 “b,” “d,” “N S,” íCs,” and “Y Z.”

*137That, after procuring said writ of attachment, Frederic E. Smith, of said Trask & Smith, made and annexed to said writ of attachment an affidavit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reilly v. StephensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Appleman v. MyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wiggins v. HoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McGuire v. McCallumMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API