Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hughes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay; Coumans, J. Proceedings by Frank J. Hughes under the log-lien law against John A. Hughes and the W. C. Sterling & Son Company, for work and labor. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff brought this action by attachment in the circuit court of Bay county under the so-called “log lien law” (3 Comp Laws 1915, § 14843 et *692seq.), to enforce collection of wages claimed due him for services performed while employed by defendant John A. Hughes, his brother, upon certain cedar posts, telegraph poles and railroad ties, which were purchased by the appellant, W. C. Sterling & Son Company. The forest products attached were cut from lands tributary to the Taquamenon rive'i in Chippewa county, and driven down that stream to its mouth, where they were delivered on board vessels to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Reilly v. StephensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API