Legal Opinion
Federal Corp. v. Independent School District No. 13
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 14, 1980No. 51140PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROMANG, Judge:
In this appeal Appellant alleges four propositions of error. Since these issues were not presented in Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial, we dismiss the appeal for reasons stated below.
Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial states as the only ground for the Motion that
“. . . The decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.”
The ruling appealed from involved the sus-tension of pleadings, motion and a demurrer filed by the Appellee and the award of attorney’s fees to Appellee.
Appellee initially challenges the appeal by relying on 12 O.S. 1971, § 991(b);…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Tuck v. BullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
- Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Matter of BCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.