Legal Opinion
Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors' Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1963No. Nos. 17694, 17695PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Appellants operate bowling establishments in the San Francisco Bay Area. Appellees are a number of appellants’ competitors, plus five local associations •of bowling establishment proprietors and the Bowling Proprietors’ Association of America. Appellants brought separate actions against appellees under the Antitrust Acts (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 15) •charging appellees with conspiring to fix prices for bowling in Northern California. It was alleged that appellees enforced their price-fixing agreement by excluding customers of non-cooperating bowling establishments from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Marietta Page v. Telford WorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Raisa R. Mayes v. David A. Leipziger and Levy, Leipziger & NormintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Wages v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.