Blumenthal v. Blumenthal
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
We find no substantial error in the proceedings in this case, and the decree is therefore affirmed. A restatement of the pertinent principles by another and independent opinion would result in no apparent advantage. (See ante p. 1 for opinion below.)
In addition to the authorities cited in the court’s opinion (ante p. 1, 35 A. 2d 831) some additional support may be found in Quarl v. Abbett, 102 Ind. 233, 1 N.E. 476, 52 Am. Rep. 662, and in cases listed in 126 A.L.R. 664, and 145 A.L.R. 1394.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
3Cited by10 opinions
- U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
- Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
- Cooch v. GrierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.