Legal Opinion

State v. Coburn

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 14, 2006No. 05-033PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal refusal under 23 V.S.A. § 1201(b). The statute makes it a crime for a person suspected of driving under the influence to refuse a police officer’s reasonable request for a breath test if that person has a prior DUI conviction. Defendant argues that the standardized paragraph read by police to DUI suspects, warning them that refusing a breath test may be charged as a crime, is incomprehensible as a matter of law and therefore violates due process. Defendant also argues that, absent a comprehensible warning, the State failed to prove that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. State v. BernierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. State v. Paul R. AlzagaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API