Legal Opinion

State v. Rheaume

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 26, 2005No. 04-166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Adam Rheaume entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (first offense) in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201. Pursuant to the conditional plea, defendant preserved the right to appeal solely on the issue of whether a law enforcement officer’s warrantless entry into the treatment area in a hospital emergency room violated defendant’s rights under Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution. We hold that defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hospital’s emergency room treatment area.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. KirchoffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. David TracySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API