Legal Opinion

State v. Longley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 12, 2007No. 05-326PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Wendell Longley appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, for first degree aggravated domestic assault and reckless endangerment arising out of the same incident. Defendant argues: (1) the trial court erred when it failed to include in its jury instruction on reckless endangerment the requirements that a firearm must be loaded and operable; (2) the State was required, but failed, to prove that the firearm used in the domestic assault was operable; (3) the trial court erroneously *455admitted highly prejudicial evidence of defendant’s prior bad acts; and (4) the State…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. State v. LipkaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. State v. BournSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. Jason L. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API