State v. Longley
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Wendell Longley appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, for first degree aggravated domestic assault and reckless endangerment arising out of the same incident. Defendant argues: (1) the trial court erred when it failed to include in its jury instruction on reckless endangerment the requirements that a firearm must be loaded and operable; (2) the State was required, but failed, to prove that the firearm used in the domestic assault was operable; (3) the trial court erroneously *455admitted highly prejudicial evidence of defendant’s prior bad acts; and (4) the State…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- State v. LipkaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. BournSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. Jason L. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.