State v. Dann
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendants appeal related convictions for the sale and possession of fireworks in violation of 20 V.S.A. § 3132(a). Defendant Albert Wurzberger was the owner and operator of the 1836 Country Store in Wilmington. The State charged that defendant Wurzberger sold fireworks and that defendant Carl Dann possessed fireworks. Defendants argue that the trial court erred (1) in declining to apply claim preclusion to Wurzberger’s case, (2) in declining to apply issue preclusion to either case, (3) in upholding the fireworks statute against a void-for-vagueness claim, (4) in improperly instructing the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. PollanderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- State v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. MuscariSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.