Legal Opinion

Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 27, 1999No. 98-201 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

Markman v. Westview Instruments, 52 F.3d 967 (Fed.Cir.1995) (en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), established that the construction of the terms in a patent is an issue of law for the court to decide. In the wake of Mark-man, many procedural questions have arisen, which the trial courts and appellate courts are attempting to resolve. This case presents the question of how the parties may conduct discovery with respect to claim construction issues. In the factual circumstances of this case, the Court has determined that a Rule 30(b)(6)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Phoenix W. Wheeler, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Protective National Insurance v. Commonwealth InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BB & T Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
  2. Rivera v. Kmart Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
  3. Iris Corp. Berhad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  5. Sigmund v. Starwood Urban Retail VI, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API