Legal Opinion

Reata Construction Corp. v. City of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2006No. 02-1031PublishedCited by 664 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, and Justice GREEN joined.

We grant the City of Dallas’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of April 2, 2004, and substitute the following in its place.

The issue in this case is whether the City of Dallas has governmental immunity from suit for claims by Reata Construction Corporation arising from the City’s alleged negligence. The court of appeals held that the City had immunity. We conclude that the City does not have immunity from suit as to Reata’s claims which are germane to, connected with, and properly…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by664 opinions

  1. The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and EngineeringTexas Supreme Court · 2016

659 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API