Legal Opinion

Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1912No. Nos. 17,551—(164)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

After the former appeal reported in 116 Minn. 414, 133 N. W. 986, plaintiff moved for an order dismissing the action on the merits upon the ground that he had not complied with the conditions of the order requiring plaintiff to pay defendant money. The motion was granted and the clerk of court was directed to enter judgment of dismissal upon the merits, Olin B. Lewis, J. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the action on its merits for noncompliance with the conditions upon which plaintiff was to have the relief asked for in his complaint. A former appeal in the case is reported in 116 Minn. 414, 133 N. W. 986.

It appears that plaintiff, on March 19, 1907, was severely injured through the alleged negligence of defendant and brought an action to recover the damages sustained. At the trial thereof a verdict was directed for defendant, but on appeal a new trial was awarded. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. P. & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. 107 Minn. 260,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Thackrah v. HaasSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Hirschman v. HealySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API