Legal Opinion

Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1961No. 37,769PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order vacating and setting aside a settlement of claim of damage for injuries to a minor approved by order of court. The trial court found that the injury from which the minor died resulted from the accident involved and was separate and distinct from known injuries within the contemplation of the parties at the time contract for settlement was agreed upon. The defendant claims that the injury from which the minor died was an anticipated consequence of known injuries included in the contract for settlement.

On July 1, 1955, George Doud,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Larson v. StoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. LaFleur v. C.C. Pierce Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Simons v. Schiek's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API