Legal Opinion
United States v. Vital Health Products, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 10, 1992No. 91-C-363PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are the plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment and dismissal of the defendant’s counterclaim, as well as a host of non-dispositive motions brought by the defendant. Since the non-dispositive motions will become moot once the summary judgment motions are resolved, the Court shall not address them.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Vital Health and Its Products
Defendant Conrad LeBeau is a Wisconsin citizen who is engaged in the business of promoting hydrogen peroxide and other “natural remedies” as curative substances. He conducts his business as…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- International Islamic Community of Masjid Baytulkhaliq, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Slaby v. FairbridgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
- United States v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.