Legal Opinion

Slaby v. Fairbridge

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 1, 1998No. 1:96-cv-02338PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA District Judge.

Granting All Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss; Denying All Pending Motions as Moot; and Dismissing the Above-captioned Action.

I. Introduction

Pro se plaintiff Mary Ann Slaby, on behalf of herself and Synthetic Hydrocarbons, brings this action for monetary damages based on the alleged misappropriation and mishandling of Ms. Slaby’s earthquake prediction theory. Mary Ann Slaby, a self-employed author and scientist, owns Synthetic Hydrocarbons, an unincorporated business located in the District of Columbia. The plaintiff filed suit against five separate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carol Wilding v. DNC Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Adler v. Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API