Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 07-0756PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 This matter deals with the condemnation of property by the City of Phoenix (“the City”) for land acquired in the development of the City’s light rail transit system. We hold that the right to payment under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1127(B) (2003) is not subject to the automatic stay provision of Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 62(g).

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 Lynn A. Johnson (“Johnson”) owned two parcels of property located on Camel-back Road, just west of Central Avenue, at 125 and 155 West Camelbaek Road. Both properties were zoned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Pima Cty. v. McCarville Ex Rel. Pinal Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Drh Enterprises v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. PIMA COUNTY v. DOS PICOS LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SHEPARD, Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API