Grand Valley Irrigation Co. v. Fruita Improvement Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Mesa County. Hon. Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by Tbe Fruita Improvement Company against Tbe Grand Valley Irrigation Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part. Bebearing denied en banc.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe complaint in tbis action, brought by Tbe Fruita Improvement Company, as ■ plaintiff below, against Tbe Grand Valley Irrigation Company, appellant and defendant below, contained two causes *486of action. The second cause of action is based upon a breach by the defendant of a contract, whereby it promised to pay $1,900 for professional services rendered by John P. Brookway, an attorney, whose cause of action thereon was assigned to the plaintiff. By the first cause of action, plaintiff sought to recover of the defendant company the sum of $10,000 damages,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Schenectady and Saratoga Plank Road Co. v. . ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Bank of Holly Springs v. PinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Elliott v. LindquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Smith v. CowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Fort v. BietschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Coleman v. ColemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.